Life settlement transaction system and method involving apportioned death benefit

ABSTRACT

A method and system for structuring a life settlement with a paid-up policy transaction. An existing insurance policy holder exchanges an existing insurance policy for a paid-up insurance policy or life insurance group certificate purchased by a buyer on a secondary market. The policy could also exchange their policy for being named as a beneficiary of a second insurance policy purchased by a buyer on a secondary market.

This application claims the benefit of provisional application Ser. No.60/546,211 filed Feb. 23, 2004, the entire contents of which are herebyincorporated by reference.

This application is also a continuation of application Ser. No.11/062,587, filed Feb. 23, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,756,790, issuedJul. 13, 2010, the entirety of which is incorporated by referenceherein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to life insurance transactions, specifically lifesettlement transactions and methods and systems for administering andmanaging those transactions.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

With the advent of a secondary market for life insurance policies,policy owners have an option in their management of life insurancepolices. Due to various reasons such as retirement, health, changes inestate value, estate taxes or premium costs, the owner of a policy cannow choose to sell the policy on a secondary market instead ofsurrendering the policy to the issuing insurer or allowing the policy tolapse.

FIG. 1 illustrates a typical insurance transaction flow between thepolicy holder 105 and the insurance company 103. An Owner/Holder 105first purchases a life insurance policy, as signified by the arrow 110from an insurer (Insurance Company 103) on the life of an individual.The policy has a designated beneficiary of the owner's choosing. Thepolicy has a certain face value, for example nine million dollars, to bereceived by the policy's beneficiary as a death benefit upon the deathof the individual insured under the policy. The beneficiary may be theOwner 105 or the individual whose life is insured by the policy (notshown), or another person designated by the Owner 105. The person whoselife is insured may be the Owner 105 or another person for whom theOwner 105 has an insurable interest. At step 120 the Owner 105 of thepolicy pays a premium amount, for example five hundred dollars per monthto the insurance company 103, for the policy over a certain period oftime based on various factors such as age and health. As the Owner 105of the policy pays the premium 120, a cash value for the policy mayaccrue if the amount of premium exceeds the policy's cost of theinsurance. This cash value could vary depending upon the type ofinsurance policy, for example, term, whole life or universal lifeinsurance, that is obtained. The policy may be redeemed by the Owner 105for the cash value before the death of the insured. The cash value mayalso provide an additional amount of death benefit.

A life settlement is a sale of an existing life insurance policy by theOwner 105 of the policy to a buyer (Buyer), who is not the issuer of thepolicy. Typically, the purchase price for the policy is less than theface value for the policy, but more than its cash value.

FIG. 1A illustrates a typical a life settlement transaction 100. Thelife settlement transaction is designed to meet the insured's financialneeds. Specifically, as the Owner 105 pays the insurance premium over aspan of, for example 30 years, various situations may arise in which theOwner 105 would need immediate access to cash, such as for repayment ofloans, for retirement, for buying a business, for paying for healthcare,or when he otherwise would decide that he did not wish to continuemaking premium payments. Accordingly, in the life settlement transactionat step 130, the Owner 105 would sell the policy to a Buyer 101 for adesignated price, for example three million dollars. At step 140, uponsuch an agreement, the Owner 105 would assign the Policy to the Buyer101, and in exchange, the Buyer 101 pays the Owner 105 in cash. As aconsequence, the Owner 105 becomes a holder (“Holder”) of the policy. Inaddition, at step 150, the Buyer 101 begins paying the premiums for thePolicy and at step 160 the Insurance Company 103 maintains the Policybut converts its owner to a Buyer 101. As such, the Owner's 105liquidity is increased. Upon the death of the individual whose life isinsured by the Policy, the Buyer 101 receives the face value amount ofthe Policy, nine million dollars.

However, such a transaction will usually have unfavorable taximplications because the cash payment from Buyer 101 to Holder 105 issubject to capital gains and/or income taxes. Accordingly, there is aneed and desire for a life settlement arrangement that allows the Holder105 to sell his policy while reducing tax liability. In addition, such atransaction will leave the Holder 105 with less insurance than he maydesire. Accordingly, there is a need and desire for a life settlementarrangement that allows a Holder 105 to continue to hold an insurancepolicy, albeit with a lower face amount.

Moreover, there is a need in the art for a computer system and acomputerized method that manages and administers life settlementtransactions in order that substantial numbers of settlements can beefficiently implemented and administered.

SUMMARY

The present system and method involves life settlement transactions witha paid-up life insurance policy (SWAPP) that allows a holder to sellhis/her existing life insurance policy on the secondary market whileminimizing tax liability for such a transaction and continuing to havesome level of life insurance.

In a first embodiment, a person purchases a first insurance policy froman insurer. The first policy has a death benefit and names the person asthe beneficiary. Subsequently, the person assigns the first policy to abuyer. The buyer then purchases a second insurance policy from aninsurer and names the person as beneficiary of the second insurancepolicy. The second policy is paid-up and has a death benefit that isless than the death benefit of the first policy. The buyer is made abeneficiary of the first policy and receives the death benefit of thefirst policy upon the death of the individual whose life is insured. Thebuyer may be any individual or other entity.

In a second embodiment, a person purchases a first insurance policy froman insurer, and subsequently assigns the first policy to a buyer. Thebuyer then causes a paid-up second insurance policy to issue to theperson with a death benefit that is less than the first policy. Thebuyer receives the death benefit of the first policy upon the death ofthe individual whose life is insured.

In a third embodiment, a person purchases a first insurance policy froman insurer. In conjunction with the sale, the seller joins a lifeinsurance consumer association or other association having similarattributes and receives a paid-up group life insurance certificate underthe association's group policy it has obtained from a life insurancecarrier for its members. The buyer receives the death benefit of thefirst policy upon the death of the individual whose life is insured.

The invention can be implemented manually or electronically through anetwork of interconnected or accessible computers. The present inventionimplements a method of transacting a life settlement agreementcomprising: receiving an assigned first insurance policy from a policyholder; purchasing a second insurance policy from an insurance company;naming said policy holder as a beneficiary of said second insurancepolicy; and collecting a death benefit of said first insurance policyupon an insured under the assigned first insurance policy beingdeceased. This method of further comprises assigning a second insurancepolicy to said policy holder. This method allows the policy holder toname another person as the beneficiary of the second policy.

Further, the present invention implements a method of transacting a lifesettlement agreement comprising: receiving an assigned first insurancepolicy from a policy holder; purchasing a second insurance policy froman insurance company; assigning said second insurance policy to saidpolicy holder; and collecting a death benefit of said first insurancepolicy upon said policy holder being deceased.

The present invention also implements a method of transacting a lifesettlement agreement comprising: receiving an assigned first insurancepolicy from a policy holder, wherein said first insurance policy isplaced in a trust account; purchasing a group insurance policy from aninsurance company on behalf of members of an association owning saidtrust account; assigning a life insurance group certificate to saidpolicy holder; and collecting a death benefit of said first insurancepolicy upon said policy holder being deceased.

The present invention implements a computer based system for transactinga life settlement agreement, said system comprising: a computerprocessor for processing data; a storage means for storing data on andreading data from a storage medium; a computer program, said programimplementing the steps of: managing receipt of an assigned firstinsurance policy from a policy holder; purchasing a second insurancepolicy from an insurance company; naming said policy holder as abeneficiary of said second insurance policy; and managing a collectionof a death benefit of said first insurance policy upon an insured underthe assigned first policy being deceased.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features and advantages of the invention will be betterunderstood from the following detailed description, which is provided inconnection with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating a conventional life insurancetransaction;

FIG. 1A is a flow chart illustrating a conventional life settlementtransaction;

FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating a first embodiment of a lifesettlement transaction according to the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a second embodiment of a lifesettlement transaction according to the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating a third embodiment of a lifesettlement transaction according to the present invention; and

FIG. 5 is a diagram of a processing system implementing the variousembodiments of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the following detailed description, reference is made to theaccompanying drawings, which are a part of the specification, and inwhich is shown by way of illustration various embodiments whereby theinvention may be practiced. These embodiments are described insufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to make and use theinvention. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilizedwithout departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.

FIG. 2 illustrates a life settlement transaction 200 according to afirst exemplary embodiment of the invention. The life settlementtransaction is based on a life settlement transaction 100 of FIG. 1A;however, the Policy Holder/Owner 205 (“Owner”) does not receive cashupon the assignment of the policy to a Policy Buyer 201 (“Buyer”).Rather, the Owner 205 receives the death benefit under a newly purchasedsecond policy.

The Owner 205 purchases a life insurance policy (Policy 1) from anInsurance Company 203. Subsequently, in step 230, the Owner 205 reachesan agreement with a Buyer 201, and the Owner 205 assigns Policy 1 to theBuyer 201.

In exchange for this assignment, the Buyer 201 at step 240 purchases asecond insurance policy (Policy 2) from a Second Insurance Company 207and then names the Owner 205 at step 235 as the beneficiary of Policy 2.The amount of insurance is calculated by the Buyer using conventionallyknown actuarial information. By way of example, the followingillustration provides details about calculating the correct amount ofinsurance:

-   -   1 Jan. 1990 John Smith Purchases Life Insurance Policy from XYZ        Life Insurance Company as follows:        -   Owner John Smith        -   Insured John Smith        -   Beneficiary Jane Smith        -   Death Benefit $9,000,000        -   Premiums $20,000/month for 30 years        -   Cash Surrender Value $0    -   Next 10 years John pays $20,000 per month to XYZ Life Insurance        Company    -   1 Jan. 2000 John Smith no longer needs the full $9,000,000 of        death benefit and cannot afford the $20,000/month premium        payment        -   Details of his insurance policy with XYZ Life Insurance            company are now as follows        -   Owner John Smith        -   Insured John Smith        -   Beneficiary Jane Smith        -   Death Benefit $9,000,000        -   Premiums $20,000/month for 20 years        -   Cash Surrender Value $1,000,000    -   2 Jan. 2000 A buyer is willing to purchase the XYZ Life        Insurance policy for $2,000,000.        -   Due to the tax implications of receiving a cash payment, and            John's continued need for death benefit protection, the            buyer agrees to provide John with a new paid up policy as            consideration for the assignment of XYZ policy rather than a            cash payment.        -   John assigns the XYZ Life Insurance policy to Buyer.        -   Buyer purchases a new guaranteed paid up policy from ABC            Life Insurance Company for a single payment of $2,000,000        -   No cash consideration is paid to John by Buyer.        -   The details of the two life insurance policies are as            follows.

XYZ Life ABC Life Insurance Policy Insurance Policy Owner Buyer BuyerInsured John Smith John Smith Beneficiary Buyer Jane Smith Death$9,000,000 $6,000,000 Benefit Premiums $20,000/month One payment at for20 years purchase of $2,000,000 Cash $1,000,000 $1,500,000 SurrenderValue

-   -   Next 5 Years Buyer continues paying $20,000/month to XYZ Life        Insurance company        -   John Smith pays no premiums to either insurance company.    -   1 Jan. 2005 John Smith Dies        -   XYZ Life Insurance Company pays $9,000,000 to Buyer        -   ABC Life Insurance company pays $6,000,000 to Jane Smith        -   Transaction terminates.

The Owner 205 thus eliminates the tax implications related to a cashpurchase, which is required to be reported as taxable income. Instead,the Owner 205 is the beneficiary of the second insurance policy, forwhich the Buyer 201 pays the premium payments to the Insurance Company207 at step 245. Accordingly, upon the death of the individual whoselife is insured at step 235, the Owner 205 receives the death benefitpayment from Policy 2 where it would not have otherwise had there been alapse or surrender of Policy 1. Also, at Step 260 the Buyer 201 receivesthe death benefit payment from Policy 1, which is greater than the deathbenefit payment of Policy 2.

FIG. 3 illustrates a life settlement transaction 300 according to asecond exemplary embodiment of the invention. The life settlementtransaction is similar to life settlement transaction 200; however, theOwner 305 receives a paid-up insurance policy (Policy 2) 340 instead ofbeing a beneficiary of Policy 2, as provided in FIG. 1. The Owner 305purchases a life insurance policy (Policy 1) from an Insurance Company303 at step 306. Subsequently, the Owner 305 reaches an agreement with aBuyer 301, and the Owner 305 assigns Policy 1 at step 330 to the Buyer301.

In exchange for this assignment, at step 350, the Buyer 301 purchasesPolicy 2 from a Second Insurance Company 307 and pays all of the premiumpayments. At step 340 Policy 2 is issued by the Second Insurance Company307 to be held by Owner 305. Policy 2 can also be purchased fromInsurance Company 303 instead of the Second Insurance Company 307. TheBuyer 301 then makes the premium payments for Policy 1 at step 355 andreceives the death benefits of Policy 1 at step 360 upon the death ofthe insured individual.

One of the benefits that results in transaction 300, like transaction200, is that the Owner 305 eliminates the tax implications from the cashconsideration in this transaction, which cash would be required to bereported as taxable income. Instead, the Owner 305 owns a paid-upinsurance policy, Policy 2. Upon the death of the individual insured,the Buyer 301 receives the death benefit payment from Policy 1, which inmost instances is greater than the death benefit payment of Policy 2.However, the Owner 305, as beneficiary, receives a death benefit fromPolicy 2 where it would not have otherwise if there had been a lapse orsurrender of Policy 1.

Both embodiments 200, 300 as well as the third embodiment discussedbelow can be implemented manually or automatically through a computersystem that is designed to administer and manage the transaction stepsautomatically, as well as calculate the premiums and face value for thesecond policy based on actuarial data. A computer based implementationis described in more detail in FIG. 5.

FIG. 4 illustrates a life settlement transaction 400 according to athird exemplary embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment, thelife settlement transaction is similar to life settlement transaction300; however, an Association or other type of member-based entity 401 isutilized to issue a group life insurance policy covering multipleMembers/Sellers 430.

As such, a Buyer 460 purchases at step 425 an existing life insurancepolicy (Existing Policy) from the owner of the policy, —Member/Seller430, who had previously purchased the Existing Policy at step 408 fromthe Insurance Company 440. The Buyer also has in place, or puts in placeat step 465, an agreement with the Association 401 for the Buyer to makepremium payments, allocate the death benefits that the Buyer receivesfrom the existing Policy, or any other relevant obligations.Accordingly, the Buyer then proceeds to continue to make the premiumpayments at step 450. Subsequently, at step 405, the Member/Seller 430becomes part of Association 401 by paying the required membership fees.

In exchange for the Member's 430 membership fees, at step 435, theMember/Seller 430 receives membership benefits, including the ability toreceive a Life Insurance Group Certificate (Certificate) 437 inconjunction with assigning the Existing Policy to the Buyer 460. TheCertificate represents a paid-up life insurance policy. The paid up lifeinsurance policy is created as follows: at step 415, the Certificate isobtained by the Association 401, which purchases a Life Insurance GroupPolicy from a Second Insurance Company 410. The Association 401 thenmakes premium payments 445 on the policy. Alternatively, the group lifeinsurance policy can be purchased by another suitable entity thatqualifies as a group insurance purchaser with the selected insurancecarrier.

Upon the death of the Member/Seller 430 (or other individual whose lifeis insured), the Buyer 460 receives the death benefit payment from theExisting Policy at step 455, which preferably is greater than the deathbenefit payment on the Certificate 475 received by the Association 401or other suitable entity. However, the Member/Seller 430 or his/herbeneficiary (not shown) receives a death benefit in the form ofMembership Benefits 435 from the Association 401 where it would not haveotherwise due to the lapse or surrender of the Existing Policy.

As previously noted, FIG. 5 illustrates a computer-based system 600 forimplementing the various embodiments of the present invention. It shouldbe understood that each embodiment of the present invention can beimplemented manually as well. Computer system 600 is merely an exemplarysystem, which has the ability to use multiple workstations, servers andpersonal computers as required. In one embodiment, the system 600utilizes a pair of servers 606 and 608 and an Internet connection 604,whereby an Insurance Company 440 can communicate electronically with anAssociation through Internet Connection 610 to conduct a group lifeinsurance policy transaction. Many other configurations, however, can beemployed, and this is only one example of an architecture.

In another example, the server and the data from which the serveroperates can be operated solely by or under the auspices of an insurancecarrier 410 or 440. The server can also be relied upon to calculateappropriate levels of insurance to purchase in exchange for the“purchased” policy and the actuarial factors relevant to both policies.In this example, an individual may become an Insured Member by, forexample, using a personal computer 620 to communicate over the Internet604 to a server 608 maintained by the Association 401. In addition,using a server 606 and an internet connection 630, an Insurance Company410 can communicate with a Buyer 401 or 430 in a single life insurancepolicy transaction. A general purpose computer having a floppy driveand/or CD-ROM, such as a personal computer, laptop or a workstation maybe used by the Insured Member to conduct transactions with theAssociation and/or Insurance Company (not shown). A computer program forinstructing a computer or server to implement the various embodiments ofthe present invention is loaded onto a computer readable medium,workstation, server or personal computer for use by computer-basedsystem 600.

The above description and drawings illustrate embodiments, which achievethe features and advantages of the present invention. However, it is notintended that the present invention be strictly limited to theabove-described and illustrated embodiment. Any modifications, thoughpresently unforeseeable, of the present invention that come within thespirit and scope of the following claims should be considered part ofthe present invention.

It is well known in the art that any of servers, personal computers orlaptop computers (e.g., 604, 606, 608, 612 and 620) can possess at leastcentral processing unit that interprets and executes instructions; inputdevices, such as a keyboard and a mouse, through which data and commandsenter the computer; memory that enables the computer to store programsand data; and output devices, such as printers and display screens, thatshow the results after the computer has processed data. (Source: TheAmerican. Heritage® Science Dictionary Copyright, © 2002 by HoughtonMifflin Company).

1. A computer-implemented method for conducting a life settlementtransaction with a policyholder, comprising: receiving by a buyer, inexchange for consideration given to a policyholder, an assignment by thepolicyholder of life insurance having a first death benefit value on alife of an insured, the consideration having an estimated economic valueapproximately equivalent to a life settlement value of the lifeinsurance at the time of the assignment; the life settlement value ofthe life insurance being determined on a computer and stored in acomputer memory; selecting, by a computer, a second death benefit valuefor life insurance on the life of the insured calculated using the lifesettlement value, the second death benefit value being a portion of thefirst death benefit value; and at least part of the consideration beingpayment on premiums for the life insurance having the second deathbenefit, wherein the life insurance having the second death benefit isprovided by a second life insurance policy purchased by the buyer, thesecond life insurance policy being issued by someone other than thebuyer, and the life insurance having the second death benefit beingissued by someone other than the buyer.
 2. The method of claim 1,wherein the second life insurance policy is a paid up life insurancepolicy, and the second death benefit value is calculated using the lifesettlement value as the premium amount.
 3. The method of claim 1 whereinthe second death benefit value is made payable to the policyholder. 4.The method of claim 1, wherein the assignment comprises thepolicyholder's agreeing to allocate benefits existing under the lifeinsurance.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the receiving stepcomprises using a computer system with a component for causingsubmitting the assignment to the issuer of the life insurance byexchanging messages with another computer system over a network.
 6. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the receiving step comprises using a computersystem with a component for estimating an economic value of the lifeinsurance and determining at least one combination of the considerationand characteristics associated with the second death benefit value atthe time when the steps of receiving and causing are performed.
 7. Themethod of claim 6, wherein the characteristics include the second deathbenefit value.
 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the characteristicsinclude a cash value amount of life insurance having the second deathbenefit value.
 9. The method of claim 6, wherein the characteristicsinclude a premium amount of life insurance having the second deathbenefit value.
 10. A system for facilitating life settlementtransactions, the system comprising: at least one computer, the at leastone computer having at least one processor configured to: receive, by abuyer, in exchange for consideration given to a policyholder, anassignment by the policyholder of life insurance having a first deathbenefit value on a life of an insured, the consideration having anestimated economic value approximately equivalent to a life settlementvalue of the life insurance at the time of the assignment; the lifesettlement value of the life insurance being determined on a computerand stored in a computer memory; select a second death benefit value forlife insurance on the life of the insured calculated using the lifesettlement value, the second death benefit value being a portion of thefirst death benefit value; and at least part of the consideration beingpayment on premiums for the life insurance having the second deathbenefit, wherein the life insurance having the second death benefit isprovided by a second life insurance policy purchased by the buyer, thesecond life insurance policy being issued by someone other than thebuyer and the life insurance having the second death benefit beingissued by someone other than the buyer.
 11. The system of claim 10,wherein the second life insurance policy is a paid up life insurancepolicy, and the second death benefit value is calculated using the lifesettlement value as the premium amount.
 12. The system of claim 10wherein the second death benefit value is made payable to thepolicyholder.
 13. The system of claim 10, wherein the assignmentcomprises the policyholder's agreeing to allocate benefits existingunder the life insurance.
 14. The system of claim 10, wherein thecomputer further includes a component for causing submitting theassignment to the issuer of the life insurance by exchanging messageswith another computer system over a network.
 15. The system of claim 10,wherein the computer further includes a component for estimating aneconomic value of the life insurance and determining at least onecombination of the consideration and characteristics associated with thesecond death benefit value at the time when the steps of receiving andcausing are performed.
 16. The system of claim 15, wherein thecharacteristics include the second death benefit value.
 17. The systemof claim 15, wherein the characteristics include a cash value amount oflife insurance having the second death benefit value.
 18. The system ofclaim 15, wherein the characteristics include a premium amount of lifeinsurance having the second death benefit value.
 19. Acomputer-implemented method for conducting a life settlement transactionwith a policyholder, comprising: receiving by a buyer, in exchange forconsideration given to a policyholder, an assignment by the policyholderof an interest in life insurance having a first death benefit value on alife of an insured, the consideration having an estimated economic valueapproximately equivalent to a life settlement value of the lifeinsurance at the time of the assignment; the life settlement value ofthe life insurance being determined on a computer and stored in acomputer memory; selecting, by a computer, a second death benefit valuefor life insurance on the life of the insured calculated using the lifesettlement value, the second death benefit value being a function of thefirst death benefit value; at least part of the consideration beingpayment of premiums on the life insurance, the life insurance having thesecond death benefit being issued by someone other than the buyer. 20.The method of claim 19, wherein the second death benefit value is aportion of the first death benefit value.
 21. The method of claim 19,wherein the assignment comprises the policyholder's agreeing to allocatebenefits existing under the life insurance.
 22. A system forfacilitating life settlement transactions, the system comprising: atleast one computer, the at least one computer having at least oneprocessor configured to: receive by a buyer, in exchange forconsideration given to a policyholder, an assignment by the policyholderof an interest in life insurance having a first death benefit value on alife of an insured, the consideration having an estimated economic valueapproximately equivalent to a life settlement value of the lifeinsurance at the time of the assignment; the life settlement value ofthe life insurance being determined on a computer and stored in acomputer memory; select a second death benefit value for life insuranceon the life of the insured calculated using the life settlement value,the second death benefit value being a function of the first deathbenefit value; at least part of the consideration being payment ofpremiums on the life insurance, the life insurance having the seconddeath benefit being issued by someone other than the buyer.
 23. Themethod of claim 22, wherein the second death benefit value is a portionof the first death benefit value.
 24. The method of claim 22, whereinthe assignment comprises the policyholder's agreeing to allocatebenefits existing under the life insurance.